Court No. - 71
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28744 of 2019 Applicant :- Sultan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Ram Raj Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No.52 of 2019 (State Vs. Sultan), arising out of Charge-Sheet No.74 of 2018 dated 04.11.2018 in Case Crime No.72 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(Dha) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Lalpura, District Hamirpur.
As per the allegations made in the FIR and the statement of the first informant, it is alleged that on 14.09.2018 in the late evening, the applicants tried to forcibly take away the victim and on raising alarm, he fled away. Earlier also, the applicant had abused him with the name of his caste with an intention to humiliate and intimidate him in public view and threatened him of life.
Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the FIR and the material collected during the course of investigation, no offence is disclosed against the applicants and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He has pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
Per contra, learned AGA has submitted that from the perusal of the allegations made in the FIR and the material collected during the course of investigation, prima facie offence is clearly made out against the applicants and as such, entire proceedings cannot be quashed.
Moreover, all the submissions made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CrPC. At this stage, only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
The prayer for quashing the entire proceedings is therefore refused.
However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 Nadim