Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sukkhi Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 68
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21459 of 2019 Applicant :- Sukkhi Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shubham Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Code') has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 08.04.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Saidpur, Ghazipur as well as the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 15 of 2019 (Sona Devi v. Sukkhi Yadav and others), under Section 506 of I.P.C., Police Station - Khanpur, District - Ghazipur.
Learned counsel for the applicants contended that there is dispute between the parties. In her statement under Section 200 of Cr.P.C., the complainant/opposite party no. 2 Sona Devi has not specified the date of occurrence and person/applicant who threatened her. Accordingly, no offence under Section 506 of I.P.C. is made out against the applicants.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer and contention raised by learned counsel for the applicant and contended that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the trial court.
Alternative remedy is available to the applicants to submit application under Section 245(2) of the Code to get themselves discharged. Accordingly, it is not appropriate for this Court to pass any order in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code.
In view of above, prayer for quashing the impugned summoning order as well as the entire proceedings in the aforesaid case is hereby refused.
Accordingly, it is directed that in case the applicants file an application under Section 245(2) of the Code for discharge through counsel within 30 days from today, the same shall be decided by the trial court by a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law.
Till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive measure shall be adopted against the applicants.
With the aforesaid observation/direction, the instant application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 29.5.2019 I. Batabyal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sukkhi Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2019
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Shubham