Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sujeet Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10949 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sujeet Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents.
The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking a direction to the respondents to constitute a Committee to enquire into the allegation against the respondent no.5.
The averments in the writ petition do not disclose specific allegation against the respondent no.5. The allegaion of financial irregularities is also vague. The names of the villagers who have been given the double benefit of Awas Yojana have also not been mentioned. The allegation with regard to the Pradhanmantri Awas Yojana is also not spelt out. In the affidavit which has been filed alongwith the complaint also no specific particulars have been given. Averments of affidavit are also absolutely vague.
This is a vague writ petition and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 N Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sujeet Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Pradeep Kumar Srivastav