Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sujana Mallika W/O Late Yohana And Others vs Mahadevamma W/O Mahadevaiah And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|06 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.119 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
1. SUJANA MALLIKA W/O LATE YOHANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
2. HELEN SHEEBA D/O LATE YOHANA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
3. ABRAHAM S/O LATE SUMITHRAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.
ALL R/AT. KELLAMBALI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK.
(BY SRI. RAMAN B.V. ADV., (ABSENT)) AND:
1. MAHADEVAMMA W/O MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. DODDAHOMMA VILLAGE KAVALANDE HOBLI NANAJANAGUDU TALUK.
2. K. KAGGALAIAH S/O LATE KUNNIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS WORKING AS SHERASTEDAR CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C. YELANDURU.
… APPELLANTS 3. THYAGARAJU S/O LATE HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS.
4. SHIVARAJU S/O LATE HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS RESP. NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT. SIDDAIAHNAPURA VILLAGE HARADANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK.
5. MAHALAKSHMI D/O HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT. KALLAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK.
6. HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE KUNAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT. KELLAMBALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI CHAMRAJANAGARA TALUK.
7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER K.I.D.B. MYSORE REGIONAL OFFICE K.R.S. ROAD, MYSORE.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR KASHIMATH, ADV., FOR C/R2) - - -
This R.S.A. is filed under Section 100 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 21-10-2016 passed in R.A.No.7/2016 on the file of the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, dismissing the appeal and confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 16-7-2016 passed in OS No.124/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Chamarajanagar.
This R.S.A. coming on for Admission this day, the Court delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT This Court, on 23.10.2019, adjourned the appeal to be listed today because none appeared for the appellants. This Court also recorded that if there is no appearance on behalf of the appellants today, the appeal will be dismissed for default.
2. Despite this order, none appears for the appellants. The concerned is obviously not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/-
JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sujana Mallika W/O Late Yohana And Others vs Mahadevamma W/O Mahadevaiah And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
06 November, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad