Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sudhir Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28901 of 2018 Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kaustubh Srivastava,Kandarp Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Ajay Kumar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 3.2.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 487 of 2016 (State Vs. Sudhir), arising out of Case Crime No.436 of 2010, under Sections- 135 Electricity Act, Police Station- Khardhauda, District- Meerut pending in the court of Special Judge (E.C Act).
It has been stated that the offence alleged is compoundable. The applicant is ready to settle the matter with the opposite party no. 2. Reliance has also been placed on a recent Supreme Court decision in the case of Suresh Ganpati Halvankar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No. 156 of 2018, decided on 22.01.2018.
Considering the above, the present application is disposed of with the following directions:
i) the applicant shall pay up the entire electricity dues as claimed, upto date, within a period of three weeks from today.
ii) upon payment of the electricity dues, the applicant shall, within a week therefrom file before the learned court below an application seeking compounding of the offence, as alleged and deposit the compounding charges.
iii) any amount that may have been deposited either towards electricity dues or compounding charges may be adjusted against the amount that may be claimed against the applicant.
iv) upon proof of payment of the electricity dues and the compounding charges, if any, the learned Court below shall decide the application for compounding filed by the applicant, in accordance with law before proceedings further, with the trial.
v) for a period of one month from today, and in the event of continued compliance being made by the applicant (of this order and also of the further directions that may be issued by the learned court below, within time as may be granted by it), coercive measures may not be adopted against the applicant till disposal of the compounding application.
vi) in the event of default on part of the applicant, the protection being granted by this order shall stand lifted and the applicant may be dealt with as if this order had not been passed.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Gaurav Pal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudhir Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Kaustubh Srivastava Kandarp Srivastava