IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.58755 OF 2013 (GM-PP) BETWEEN:
MR SUDESH KAUL S/O BRIJ NATH KAUL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO.S-45 SECTOR 1 RETIRED PURCHASE OFFICER TICKET NUMBER 9975/430 UNIT MTB, BANGALORE-560013.
(By MR. M SHAMIL, ADV. FOR MR. P B AJIT, ADV.) AND:
1. HMT LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT 1913 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT HMT BHAVAN NO.59 BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE-560032 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
2. ESTATE OFFICER ESTATE DEPARTMENT HMT LIMITED COMMON TOWN ADMINISTRATION COMMON SERVICES DIVISION HMT POST BANGALORE.
… PETITIONER (By MR. J HUDSON SAMEL FOR C/R1 (ABSENT) MR. T RAJARAM, ADV. FOR R1 (ABSEBT) R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.18.11.2013, PASSED BY THE APPELLATE COURT IN MISC. APPEAL NO.29/2011, PASSED BY THE XLI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-42) VIDE ANNEX-B.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.M.Shamil, learned counsel for Sri.P.B.Ajit, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.T.Rajaram, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has vacated the premises in question. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SS