Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

State Of U P vs Harbansh Lal & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 58
Delay Condonation Application In Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 370 of 2003 Appellant :- State Of U.P.
Respondent :- Harbansh Lal & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govt. Advocate,G.S.Hajela
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the appellant.
Cause/reasons shown in the affidavit filed in support of the application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condoning the delay is not sufficient.
Accordingly, the application is rejected.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 Anand Sri./-
Court No. - 58
Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 370 of 2003 Appellant :- State Of U.P.
Respondent :- Harbansh Lal & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govt. Advocate,G.S.Hajela
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the appellant.
As the delay condonation application is dismissed, the application for leave to appeal is hereby rejected and consequently the present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 Anand Sri./-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

State Of U P vs Harbansh Lal & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2018
Judges
  • Ravindra Nath Kakkar
Advocates
  • Govt Advocate G S Hajela