Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Subbiah vs S.Gomathi

Madras High Court|01 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner is the husband and the respondent is the wife. They had been married on 01.07.1993. In the affidavit of the petitioner, it is seen that the age of the petitioner is 55 years. The respondent had initiated the proceedings in HMOP.No.173 of 2016 before the Sub Court, Devakottai, seeking to dissolve the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent.
2.The learned counsel stated that the petitioner is working as the Vice Chancellor of Alagappa University, Karaikudi in Sivagangai District. However, in the affidavit it is stated that the petitioner is working at Vice Chancellor Office, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. It is also stated that there is an elder son, who is unfortunately mentally challenged and now, he is in the custody of the respondent. The respondent is working as a Professor at Madurai. She deem it fit to file HMOP.No.173 of 2016 before the Sub Court, Devakottai. Among the reasons for seeking transfer, the petitioner claims that it would actually benefit the respondent and also claims that his reputation would be lowered if he appears before the Sub Court, Devakottai. So far as the first reason is concerned, the respondent should have considered her relative hardships before initiating the proceedings on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai. The said Court is actually the Court which has jurisdiction. It is not for the petitioner to express concern on behalf of the respondent and express her supposed difficulties if any. The said reason is rejected. With regard to the second reason I am not able to affected, if the very same divorce proceedings are continued in any Court. The fact is that divorce petition is pending and that should be the cause for concern and reputation is not dependent on the situs of the litigation or where it has been instituted.
3.I find no reasons to entertain the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. The reasons does not stand legal scrutiny. Hence, this petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected M.P is also closed.
To
1.The Sub Judge, Devakottai.
2.The Judge, Family Court, Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Subbiah vs S.Gomathi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
01 June, 2017