IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.NO.52805/2013 (S RES) BETWEEN SRI THIPPESWAMY C S/O SRI.BHEEMAPPA CHAKKADI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WORKING AS LECTURER IN EDUCATION, BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR CENTENARY DEGREE COLLEGE, HARIHARA-577 601, RESIDING AT KADARANAYAKANAHALLI, HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.
(BY SRI VIKRAM BALAJI B L, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001.
... PETITIONER 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION NEAR DEVANGA KALYANA MANTAPA, JAIL ROAD, SHIMOGA-577 451.
5. THE REGISTRAR KUVEMPU UNIVERSITY, SHANKARA GHATTA, SHIMOGA-577 451.
6. BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD.), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, J.C.EXTENSION, 3RD MAIN, HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577601.
7. THE PRINCIPAL BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR CENTENARY DEGREE COLLEGE, POST BOX NO.6, J.C.COLONY, HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 601.
8. SRI M.V.MAHADEVAPPA S/O MATADA VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT GANGANARASI VILLAGE, GUTTUR POST, HARIHARA TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 601.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S.MAHANTHES, AGA FOR R1-R3 & R4, SRI T.P.RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADV. FOR R5, SRI M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADV. FOR R8, R2, R6 & R7 - SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 TO R-7 TO HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO THE SUPPRESSION OF MATERIAL FACTS RESORTED TO BY THE R-8 AS STATED IN DETAIL IN THE REPRESENTATION DTD.7.10.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEX-F ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. Pursuant to the order dated 18.06.2019, respondent No.2 has passed orders by proceedings dated 16.07.2019. By the said proceedings, the petitioner has been held to be entitled to the benefit of grant-in-aid. Memo is preferred enclosing the copy of the proceedings dated 16.07.2019. The same is taken on record.
2. In that view of the matter, petition is disposed off in terms of the memo and the order dated 16.07.2019 passed by respondent No.2.
3. Learned Counsel for contesting respondent No.8 prays time to file objections to the orders passed by respondent No.2. If respondent No.8 is aggrieved, he his entitled to agitate the same separately before the appropriate forum. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE KK CT-HR