Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Tenzin Nyima vs The Deputy Commissioner Mysore And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|02 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 41230 OF 2017 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI.TENZIN NYIMA S/O.LATE SRI.SHERAB THENPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS CAMP NO.4, BYLAKUPPE HARNAHALLI HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK REPRESENTED BY HIS G.P.A. HOLDER OGYEN YESHE S/O.BOHJOD AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS CAMP NO.4, BYLAKUPPE, HARNAHALLI HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 104. (BY SRI.K.JAYARAM, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE – 571 129.
….PETITIONER 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE -570 001.
3. THE TAHSILDAR PERIYAPATNA TALUK PERIYAPATNA MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 107.
4. THE GOVERNMENT SURVEYOR AT TAHSILDAR OFFICE PERIYAPATNA TALUK, PERIYAPATNA MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 107.
5. P.B.DEVAIAH S/O.P.K.BIDDAPPA 1ST BLOCK, KUSHALANAGAR KUSHALNAGARA TOWN SOMAVARAPET TALUK MADIKERE DISTRICT – 571 234.
6. NAMGYAL NUDUP S/O.OGENSERANG MAJOR IN AGE KOPPA VILLAGE, B.M.ROAD PERIYAPATNA TALUK PERIYAPATNA MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 104.
7. M.K.DINESHA S/O.M.J.KALAPPA MAJOR IN AGE 8. H.D.ANITHA W/O.M.K.DINESHA MAJOR IN AGE RESPONDENTS NO.7 & 8 ARE R/AT.MULLASOGE VILLAGE NEAR KUSHALNAGAR TOWN SOMAVARAPET TALUK MADIKERE DISTRICT – 571 234.
9. K.S.SATHYANARAYANA S/O.LATE SHANKAR BHAT KOPPA VILLAGE, B.M.ROAD PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 104.
(BY SRI.T.S.MAHANTESH, AGA) ...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.14.3.2017 PASSED BY THE R-1 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO.31/2015-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and accordingly, memo is filed to the said effect.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to resort to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
Sd/- JUDGE VMB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Tenzin Nyima vs The Deputy Commissioner Mysore And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
02 January, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha