IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.937 OF 2010 C/W REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.936 OF 2010 In RFA No.937/2010 BETWEEN:
Sri. Tajmul Ahmed, Aged about 73 years, S/o. Abdul Basith, No.765, 13th Cross, 23rd Main, II Phase, J.P.Nagar, Bengaluru-560078.
(By Sri. Kaleemullah Shariff, Advocate)(Absent) AND:
The Chief Engineer, Corporation of the City of Bengaluru, BBMP Office, Bengaluru.
…Appellant ... Respondent This RFA is filed under Order XLI Rule 1 and Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2010 passed in O.S.No.5692/1993 on the file of the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge Bengaluru, dismissing the suit for permanent injunction.
In RFA No.936/2010 BETWEEN:
Sri. Tajmul Ahmed, Aged about 73 years, S/o. Abdul Basith, No.765, 13th Cross, 23rd Main, II Phase, J.P.Nagar, Bengaluru-560078.
(By Sri. Kaleemullah Shariff, Advocate)(Absent) AND:
1. The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, Bengaluru-560001.
2. Smt. Magiadevi Aged about 56 years, No.765, 13th Cross, 23rd Main, II Phase, JP Nagar, Bengaluru-560078.
3. Sri. R.Govinda Naidu, S/o. Sri. Rangaiah Naidu, No.133, 3rd Cross, 2nd Main, II Stage, JP Nagar, Bengaluru-560078.
…Appellant ... Respondents (By Sri. A.M.Vijay, Advocate for R1) This RFA is filed under Order XLI Rule 1 and Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2010 passed in O.S.No.5901/1994 on the file of the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge Bengaluru, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction.
These appeals coming on for admission this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent today. On 19.12.2018 also the appellant’s counsel was absent. Therefore both these appeals are dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE KMV/-