IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS REVIEW PETITION NO.211/2017 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.204/2016 BETWEEN:
SRI P DIVAKAR S/O LATE H PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.327, 17TH MAIN ROAD 3RD CROSS, MUNESHWARA BLOCK BENGALURU – 560 060 (BY SRI.VIVEK S REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI.SHANKAR REDDY.C., ADV.) AND:
... PETITIONER 1. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PARISARA BHAVANA IST TO 5TH FLOOR, NO.49, CHURCH STREET BANGALORE – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY 2. M/S KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD FIRST FLOOR, GULBARGA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUILDING NEAR SARDAR VALLABHAHAI PATEL CHOWK GULBARGA 585101 REPRESENTED BY ITS ENVIRONMENT OFFICER 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE – 560 001 4. SRI C.MAHESHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS LAW ASSISTANT NO.49, PARISARA BHAVAN KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, 4TH FLOOR CHURCH STREET BENGALURU – 560 001 5. SMT.PREMALATHA S AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS LAW ASSISTANT NO.49, PARISARA BHAVAN KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, 4TH FLOOR, CHURCH STREET BENGALURU – 560 001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.GURURAJ JOSHI, ADV. FOR R1 & R2;
SRI.PRASHANTH, HCGP FOR R3; R4 & R5 ARE SERVED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:23/03/2017 PASSED IN WA NO. 204/2016(S-RES), ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, NARAYANA SWAMY J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner. There is no ground for interference. Review Petition accordingly sands rejected. At this stage, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that the Departmental Enquiry has been initiated and it has been concluded and it has reached the stage of taking steps either to accept or reject the enquiry report. The said submission is placed on record.
2. The learned senior counsel appearing for the counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be reserved to the petitioner to challenge the same.
3. It is to be observed that liberty is always there to a person to approach the Court/Tribunal, etc., if he is so aggrieved.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE lnn