Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri N Kumar vs Smt Puttalakshmi @ Puttamma And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|09 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ R.F.A. NO.1331 OF 2011 (PAR) BETWEEN:
SRI. N. KUMAR, MAJOR SON OF LATE NINGARAJAPPA R/AT NO.14/80, TEMPLE ROAD VIJAYSHREEPURA MANASAGANGOTHRI POST MYSORE ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. NATARAJU.P, ADVOCATE OF M/S P. NATARAJU ASSOCIATES) AND:
1. SMT. PUTTALAKSHMI @ PUTTAMMA WIFE OF VENKATARAMU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.63, ABEDKAR SAMUDAYA BHAVAN ROAD, KYATAMARANAHALLI N.R. MOHALLA, MYSORE-570007 2. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O PUTTASIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT T. DODDAPURA VILLAGE MAVINAHALLY POST TALAKADU HOBLI T. NARASIPURA TALUK-571122 3. SMT. MARAMMA W/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE VARUNA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK-570010 4. SMT. PREMA @ PAPAMMA W/O CHIKKECHELUVA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT YANDANAHALLY VILLAGE VARUNA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK-570010 5. SMT. RADHA W/O LATE MURTHY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT KUPPYA GRAMA KASABA HOBLI T. NARASIPURA TALUK-571124 6. SRI. KEMPAIAH S/O LATE KANDA ANKAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 7. SMT. PUTTALINGAMMA S/O KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 8. SRI. PUTTASWAMY S/O KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 9. SRI. DEVARAJU S/O KEMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 10. SRI. MOHAN KUMAR S/O KEMPAIAH AGED 37 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.6 TO 10 ARE R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE VARUNA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK-570010 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R5; R6 TO R10 ARE SERVED) ***** THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:21.2.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.419/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably and that the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal in any further.
2. Memo is perused.
3. Appeal is dismissed on account of out of court settlement arrived at between the parties.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Prs*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri N Kumar vs Smt Puttalakshmi @ Puttamma And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 October, 2019
Judges
  • B V Nagarathna
  • Suraj Govindaraj