IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.224 OF 2018 (SC) BETWEEN:
SRI K RATHNAKARA MALLYA, S/O NAGESH MALLYA, SINCE DEAD BY LRS, 1. SMT SHAMALA MALLYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O LATE RATHNAKAR MALLYA R/O BAJJODI, NEAR OLD POLICE STATION, BIKARANAKATTE, KULASHEKHAR POST, MANGALURU TALUK-575005.
2. SMT SAVITHA KAMATH, @ SAVITHA MALLYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O K RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, D/O LATE RATHNAKAR MALLYA, DOOR NO.5-12-1161, NEAR CENTRAL WAREHOUSE, HARIDAS LANE, MANNAGUDDA, MANGALURU, DK-575003.
3. SMT. SUJATHA V SHENOY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O YEKKAR V SHENOY, D/O LATE RATHNAKAR MALLYA, SHENOY COMPOUND, NEERESWALYA ROAD,KANDAK MANGALURU, DK-575001.
4. SMT VIDYA BHAT @ VIDYA MALLYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O GANESH BHAT, D/O LATE RATHNAKAR MALLYA, R/O B-001-ORACLE RESIDENCY, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, HOYSALA NAGARA, BENGALURU-560043.
5. SMT SAHANA MALLYA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O AMITH BHAT, D/O LATE RATHNAKAR MALLYA, R/O B-001-ORACLE RESIDENCY, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, HOYSALA NAGARA, BENGALURU-560043. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHIVAPRASAD K.B, ADVOCATE FOR SRI JEEVAN K, ADVOCATE) AND:
ST. ANTHONY CHARITY INSTITUTE JEPPU, MANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR PRESENT, INCUMBENT REV.FR.ONIL D’SOUZA, JEPPU, MANGALORE – 575 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SMT.SUSMITHA SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR M/S. CYRIL PRASAD PAIS) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT 1964, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.07.2017 PASSED IN S.C.NO.46/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANGALURU D.K, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SURRENDER OF VACANT POSSESSION AND FOR MESNE PROFIT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the civil revision petition.
2. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners.
3. In view of the submission of the counsel, memo is placed on record.
4. The civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. In view of dismissal of the civil revision petition, the interlocutory applications are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ