IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.88 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
SRI G.VENKATESHAIAH, S/O GUNDAPPA, AGED 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.306, 11TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD PHASE, BEML LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE-560098 …PETITIONER (BY SRI MADHAV KASHYAP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI M.S.MADHUSUDHAN, S/O G.SRIRAMAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.291/6, 2nd cross, 9TH MAIN ROAD, GOKUL I STAGE, 2nd PHASE, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE-560054 ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI CHIDANANDA H.M., ADVOCATE) *** THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT & ORDER DATED 09.06.2014 PASSED BY THE PO, FTC-IV, BANGALORE IN CRL. A. NO.659/2013 THEREBY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 11.06.2013 PASSED BY THE XII ACMM, BANGALORE IN CC NO.5225/2010, ETC., THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr. Madhav Kashyap, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Prasanna Kumar, the learned counsel for Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner and respondent compromised the matter amicably and respondent – Complainant has taken a sum of Rs.40 lakhs. He submits that now neither the respondent nor the Petitioner are not coming to Court. It appears that they are not interested to pursue the case.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. As submitted, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and parties are not interested in pursing the matter. In that light, the present revision petition is disposed of with liberty that in the event both the parties comes and files compromise petition, then, under that circumstances, this order can be revived.
In view of the above, IA No.2/2017 does not survive for consideration and it is also disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE VK