IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.37062-37067 of 2014 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
Sri. Chamundeshwari Mahila Swa Sahaya Sangh Hunsur, Tq: Hunsur, District: Mysuru – 571 105. Represented by its Secretary, Smt. M.K. Rukmini W/o Rajkumar. ... Petitioner (By Sri Hemant R. Chandangoudar, Advocate) AND:
1. State of Karnataka Represented by its Secretary, Department of Women & Child Development, M.S. Building, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Deputy Director Women & Child Welfare Department, Mysuru District, Mysuru – 570 001.
3. The Zilla Panchayat Mysuru District, Mysuru – 570 001, By its Chief Executive Officer.
4. The Hunsur Taluk Mahila Supplementary Production Training Center, Mahadevpura, Hunsur Taluk, Mysuru District – 571 105, By its President/Secretary.
5. The Krishnarajnagar Taluk Mahila Supplementary Production Training Center, Chirnahalli, Krishnarajnagar Taluk, Mysuru District – 571 602, By its President/Secretary.
6. The H.D. Kote Taluk Mahila Supplementary Production Training Center, H.D. Kote, Mysuru District – 571 114, By its President/Secretary.
7. The Piriyapatna Taluk Mahila Supplementary Production Training Center, Piriyapatna, Mysuru District – 571 107, By its President/Secretary.
8. The Mysore City & Rural Taluk Mahila Supplementary Production Training Center, Mysuru, Kasaba Hobli, Mysuru Taluk, Mysuru District – 570 016. By its President/Secretary.
9. The Nanjanagudu Taluk Mahila Supplementary, Production Training Center, Kasuvinahalli, Nanjanagudu Taluk, Mysuru District – 571 118, By its President/Secretary. …Respondents (By Smt. Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R-1 & R-2 Smt. Sandhya Rani, Advocate for R-4, R-8 & R-9 R-3, R-5, R-6 and R-7 are served but unrepresented) These writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the E-tender notifications dated 26.06.2014 issued by the respondent Nos.4 to 9 vide Annexure-D to D5.
These Writ Petitions coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R These writ petitions are directed against e-tender notification dated 26.06.2014 produced at Annexures-D to D5.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that e-tender notification at Annexures-D to D5 are for the year 2014-2015 and the term has been over. Hence, the writ petitions will not survive for consideration.
3. The submission of the learned Additional Government Advocate is placed on record.
4. In view of the above, the writ petitions do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, they are dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE MBM