IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.35468 OF 2018 (S-RES) BETWEEN SRI BABU, S/O NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O THIMMAPURA VILLAGE, THAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR - 563101.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI SUHAS B SAPPANNAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE PDO, MALLANAYAKANAHALLI, GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALLANAYAKANAHALLI, MULBAGAL TALUK-563101.
2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MULBAGAL, KOLAR, KOLAR-563101.
3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.M.S.PRATHIMA, AGA FOR R1, SRI M.NARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 (VK FILED) V/O DTD 31.10.2018, SRI M.NARAYANA REDDY LEARNED COUNSEL DIRECTED TO TAKE NOTICE TO R-3 (VK NOT FILED) ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.11.16 OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-E IN ACCORADANCE WITH LAW BY FIXING THE TIME LIMIT.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None appears for the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is to consider his representation to appoint him as a Waterman as his services have been discontinued in the year 2016.
3. Respondent No.3-The Chief Executive Officer is hereby directed to examine the petitioner’s grievance and to pass suitable orders and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy this order.
With the above observation, petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE BSR