Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Armugam Alias Chittupaiya And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|06 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.36139-36143 OF 2013 (GM-RES) Between:
1. Sri. Armugam alias Chittupaiya S/o. Kumaraswamy Aged about 45 years Resident of Meenakshipura Yadahalli, Kalluru Post Illavala Hobli Mysore Taluk Mysore District-571 607.
2. Sri. Naga S/o. Kallappa @ Raju Aged about 36 years Resident of North Bank Binakurali Hobli Pandavapura Taluk Mandya District-571 607.
3. Sri. Swamy S/o. Ayyappa Aged about 37 years Resident of K.R.S. North Bank Binakurali Hobli Pandavapura Taluk Mandya District-571 607.
4. Sri Raju S/o. Kadaiah Aged about 51 years Resident of Madura Pilu K.R.S. Town Belagulla Hobli Srirangapatna Taluk Mandya District-571 607.
5. Sri Puttaiah S/o. late Mallajaiah Aged about 63 years Resident of Talakadu Pylu Railway Station Road K.R.S. Town Srirangapatna Taluk Mandya District-570 008. …Petitioners (By Sri N.D. Jayadevappa, Advocate) And:
1. The State of Karnataka Represented by its Secretary to Government Department of Fisheries Vikasa Soudha Bangalore-560 001.
2. The Director of Fisheries Podium Block, V.V. Tower Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore-560 001.
3. The Deputy Director of Fisheries Agni Hamsa, Link Road Kuvepu Nagar Mysore-20.
4. The Assistant Director K.R. Sagara Mandya District-571 401.
5. Fisheries Co.op. Society (Regd.) Hampapura K.R. Nagar Taluk Mysore District-570 005 Represented by its Secretary. …Respondents (By Smt. Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R1 to R4 R5 is served but unrepresented.) These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 12.1.2012 passed by the 1st respondent vide Annexure-E and etc.
These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R The learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo dated 06.02.2019 seeking permission to dismiss these writ petitions as they have become infructuous. The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE SSD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Armugam Alias Chittupaiya And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
06 February, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad