IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.10334 OF 2019 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
SRI ABDUL SUBHAN SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SON OF M RAHMAN SHARIFF RESIDING AT #04 B STREET 5TH CROSS N H PALYA SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 051.
(BY MR. FAYAZ SAB B G, ADV.) AND:
1. THE KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAQFS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NO 6 DARUL AUQAF CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 560 052 2. THE KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAQFS REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR NO 6 DARUL AUQAF CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU – 560 052 (BY SMT. ASHWINI B N, ADV. FOR R1 & R2) … PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE AND GRANT THE FOLLOWING RELIEF(S) AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr. Fayaz Sab B.G., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Ashwini B.N., learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider/approve the proposal forwarded submitted for constitution of new Managing Committee to look after the affairs of Holy Shrine of Hazarath Peer Syed Jamal Shah Khadri (R.A) (Syed Jamal Shah Khadri), situated at Charminar Masjid Road, Shivajinagar, Bengluru – 560 051, which is produced herewith for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court and marked as Annexure-E.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by him shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the concerned persons within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS