IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.48337 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SREE MAHAVEERA INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY (R) NO-3178 11TH CROSS VINABHA NAGAR P H COLONY TUMKUR CITY-572 101 BY ITS SECRETARY T S SOMASHEKAR S/O LATE A R SHIVARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
(BY MR. A LOURDU MARIYAPPA, ADV.) AND:
1. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD CAUVERY BHAVAN IV FLOOR K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-09 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2. THE COMMISSIONER TUMKUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE TOWN HALL CIRCLE TUMKUR-522 101.
(BY MR. Y D HARSHA, AGA FOR R-2 MR. C N VENUGOPAL, ADV. FOR R-1) - - -
… PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN TO THEM AS ON 11.05.2017, AS PER ANNEXURE-E, IN RESPECT OF THE ALLOTMENT OF THE CA-SITE NO.1 FORMED IN JAYAPURA, TUMKUR CITY BY THE R-1 KHB TUMKUR.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.A.Lourdu Mariyappa, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr.C.N.Venugopal, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondent No.1, to consider the representation dated 11.05.2017 contained in Annexure-E submitted by the petitioner.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by it shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS