Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Pooranam vs The Special Duty Collector

Madras High Court|08 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. Heard, the learned Counsel appearing on either side.
3. The case of the petitioner is that she is a cultivating tenant under the second respondent. While so, the second respondent has filed a petition before the first respondent for eviction, as if the petitioner is an encroacher and committed default in payment of rent. Though the petitioner has been paying the rent regularly, without any notice regarding fixation of fair rent, the first respondent has passed an order of eviction and following the same, the second respondent has called for the public tender notice, dated 30.06.2017. Hence, aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has remitted the entire arrears of rent, which is not refuted by the learned Counsel for the second respondent.
5. The learned Counsel for the second respondent, on instructions, further submitted that if the petitioner regularly pays the rent or the enhanced rent whatsoever to be fixed by the authorities without any default, she would be permitted to continue. In reply to the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner undertakes to hereafter pay the monthly rent as directed by the authorities concerned without any default.
6. Recording the said undertaking given by the petitioner and also taking into consideration the submission of the learned Counsel for the second respondent, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to approach the second respondent and on her appearance, the second respondent shall execute necessary lease deed as per law. Such an exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is needless to mention that if the petitioner fails to honour her undertaking, it is open to the authorities to evict the petitioner, forthwith. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1.The Special Duty Collector Revenue Court, Narayanapuram West 1st Street, Madurai -14.
2.The Thasildar, Vadipatti Taluk Office, Vadipatti, Madurai District.
3.The Village Administrative Officer, Kallanai Village, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Pooranam vs The Special Duty Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 November, 2017