Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Special Tahsildar vs Muthukumarasamy

Madras High Court|08 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

There was no representation for the appellant on the last hearing, i.e. 06.3.2017. Today, when the matter was called in the morning, there was no representation for the appellant. However, in the interest of justice, the case was passed over by 2.30 p.m. Even at 2.30 p.m, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, I am of the view that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
08.03.2017 ga N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
ga Judgment in AS.No.945 of 2010 08.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Special Tahsildar vs Muthukumarasamy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 March, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.