IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.6774 OF 2017 (LAC) BETWEEN:
1. PRAKASH, W/O LATE L.MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.3066/2, GOKULA PARK ROAD, 4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, V.V.MOHALA, MYSORE.
2. M.SHANKAR, S/O OF LATE L.MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT LALITHADRIPURA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK.
3. M.PARAMESHA, D/O LATE M.CHANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.3066/2, GOKULA PARK ROAD, 4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, V.V.MOHALA, MYSORE.
4. PUTTALILNGAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LR’s 1. M.BASAVARAJU, S/O.LATE L.MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.817, 21ST MAIN E BLOCK, II STAGE, J.P.NAGAR, MYSORE.
2. JAYAMMA PRABHAKAR, W/O K.C.PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.192, 3RD A MAIN, R.H.C.S.LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGARA, BENGALURU.
3. M.SHASHIKALA, D/O LATE L MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.3066/2, GOKULA PARK ROAD, 4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, V.V.MOHALA, MYSORE.
4. M.USHA, W/O K.B.BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.381, 25TH CROSS, D BLOCK, J.P.NAGAR, MYSORE, APPELLANTS NO.4(2) TO 4(4) REP. BY GPA HOLDER APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 4(1). …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.NAGESH M, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSURU – 570001. ...RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.08.2011 PASSED IN LAC NO.510/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATIO AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellants absent. No representation.
2. As per the order dated 12.12.2018, three weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Further, it was ordered that if the office objections are not complied with, within such period, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal.
3. Even today the counsel for the appellants has not appeared. In view of the order dated 12.12.2018, appeal stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE BSR