Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sohan Lal vs Het Ram And Ohters

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 872 of 1995 Revisionist :- Sohan Lal Opposite Party :- Het Ram And Ohters Counsel for Revisionist :- R.C. Kandpal Counsel for Opposite Party :- .../Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by order dated 01.03.1995 passed by VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly in Sessions Trial No.422 of 1993, whereby respondents were acquitted from the offence under Section 302/34 IPC.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sohan Lal vs Het Ram And Ohters

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • R C Kandpal