Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Murthy vs The Assistant Legal Adviser And

Madras High Court|09 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner. It is seen that the petitioner sent a representation, dated 05.03.2014 to the first respondent to fix a date for conducting interview for appointment of Notary Public in Thiruvallur District in the State of Tamil Nadu. By this time, the interview would have been conducted and a Notary Public also would have been appointed. It is more than two years before now. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
09.02.2017 cs Copy to
1. The Assistant Legal Adviser and Competent Authority, Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs (Notary Cell), 4th Floor, 'A' Wing, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110 001.
2. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.
B.RAJENDRAN, J cs W.P.No.7257 of 2014 09.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Murthy vs The Assistant Legal Adviser And

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 February, 2017