Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sirmistha Roy vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23912 of 2002 Petitioner :- Smt. Sirmistha Roy Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- B.P.Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“I. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned suspension order of the petitioner dated 24-5-2002 (Annexure-6), passed by Respondent No. 2 II. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to deem the petitioner as holding the post of Child Development Project Officer, Kaneli, Kaushambi and accord her all benefits of the said service including continuity of service.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sirmistha Roy vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • B P Srivastava