Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Siddhavaram Nandakumar vs The Tahsildar

Madras High Court|07 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider his application dated 22.04.2017 seeking for transfer of the patta in his name.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's application dated 22.04.2017, the respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's application dated 22.04.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 22.04.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 07.09.2017 Index: Yes/No Rj To The Tahsildar Tiruttani Taluk Tiruvallur District.
M.DURAISWAMY,J.
Rj W.P.No.24079 of 2017 07.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Siddhavaram Nandakumar vs The Tahsildar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 September, 2017