Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shoeb vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31839 of 2018 Applicant :- Shoeb Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shridhar Tripathi,Pradeep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed to explaining the criminal history of the complainant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 26 of 2018, under Sections 395 and 412 I.P.C., P.S. Kalinger, District- Banda and is in jail since 16.05.2018, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accuseds, Mohammad Hasan and Shameem Babu, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court by orders dated 31.07.2018 and 06.08.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 28523 of 2018 and 28364 of 2018. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accuseds, Mohammad Hasan and Shameem Babu who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
In view of the above, let the applicant, Shoeb be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 26 of 2018, under Sections 395 and 412 I.P.C., P.S. Kalinger, District- Banda with the following conditions :-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co- operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shoeb vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Shridhar Tripathi Pradeep Singh