IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. L. NARAYANA SWAMY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 14169/2018 (EXCISE-PIL) BETWEEN:
1.SHIVASHANKAR K S AGED 42 YEARS S/O LATE K V SEETHARAMAN R/AT NO.851 NEW EXTENSION WARD NO 21 T. NARASIPURA - 571124 MYSORE DISTRICT 2.CHETHAN R S/O RAJU T B AGED 31 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.1 OLD THIRUMAKUDALU NARASIPURA POST: BYRAPURA - 571124 T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT 3.S. GIRISH AGED 43 YEARS S/O LATE SUBBEGOWDA R/AT WARD NO.1 OLD THIRUMAKUDALU NARASIPURA POST: BYRAPURA – 571124 T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI S K ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE -570001 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE-570001 4.THE EXCISE INSPECTOR T. NARASIPURA ZONE T. NARASIPURA - 571124 MYSORE DISTRICT 5.TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL T. NARASIPURA - 571124 MYSORE DISTRICT REP BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER 6. K VASUDEVA AGED 59 YEARS S/O LATE KONDEGOWDA NO.193 VIVEKANANDANAGARA WARD NO.6 T. NARASIPURA - 571124 MYSORE DISTRICT 7.M D BASAVARAJU AGED 55 YEARS S/O DUNDANAIKA THIBBADEVI BAR AND RESTAURANT R/AT NO 140 NAYAKARA BEEDHI MUGUR, WARD NO.1 T. NARASIPURA - 571124 MYSORE DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y H VIJAYAKUMAR, PRL.GA FOR R-1 TO 5; SRI B L SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R-6 & 7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY THE JUDGMENT RENDERED BY THE HON'BLE APEX COURT IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.12164-12166/2016 IN THE CASE OF STATE OF TAMIL NADU - VS - K. BALU AND ANOTHER BY ENFORCING ACTION AGAINST RESPONDENT NOS.6 AND 7 TO CLOSE THE LIQUOR BUSINESS ADJACENT TO NH 212 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers sought in the writ petition have already been complied by the respondents and hence, the petition has become infructuous.
2. His submission is placed on record.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE bkv