Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shiv Poojan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24323 of 2019 Petitioner :- Shiv Poojan Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the mutation case instituted in the year 2018 under Section 34/35 of the UP Land Revenue Act has not been disposed of, till date.
In view of the above, without entering into the merits of the controversy between the parties, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 2, Tehsildar, Tehsil Martinganj, Azamgarh to consider and decide the mutation case under Section 34/35 of the UP Land Revenue Act (Shiv Poojan vs. Dhamu) expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 Priyanka
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shiv Poojan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2019
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Rajendra Kumar Yadav