Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sheetla Prasad Mishra And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1420 of 2019 Appellant :- Sheetla Prasad Mishra And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ajatshatru Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ghandikota Sri Devi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A., for the State. Perused the record.
This criminal appeal under Section 14 A (1) of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short "S.C./S.T. Act") has been filed challenging the cognizance order dated 19.1.2019 in Complaint Case NO.56 of 2018 (Arti vs. Sheetla Prasad and others), under Sections 352, 504, 506 I.P.C., and Section 3 (1) (Da) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station-Parasrampur, District-Basti whereby appellants have been summoned in the aforesaid sections.
Learned counsel for the appellants contended that no offence is made out against the appellants and they have been falsely implicated in the present case.
Per contra, learned A.G.A., contended that there is no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the learned trial court.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the appellants.
Defence of the appellants/accused shall not be considered at the stage of cognizance.
Accordingly, I find no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the trial court and as such, this appeal stands dismissed.
However, none of the aforesaid offences against appellants is punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years. All the materials relevant for disposal of bail application is available on record before trial court/court concerned.
Accordingly, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court and in view of the order passed by this Court in Smt. Sakeena and others Vs. State, and another reported in 2018 (2) ACR 2190, it is directed that in case the appellants file their bail application and also pray for interim bail, their prayer for interim bail shall be considered and decided on the same day, and the regular bail shall be decided thereafter by affording an opportunity of hearing to the victim or his dependent as per the mandate of Section 15A (5) S.C./S.T. Act.
For a period of 60 days from today or till the appellants surrender and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sheetla Prasad Mishra And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Ghandikota Sri Devi
Advocates
  • Ajatshatru Pandey