Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sauniya Prasad Nishad @ Gatti vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15352 of 2018 Applicant :- Sauniya Prasad Nishad @ Gatti Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Quantity of recovered contraband is 17 gms. of smack against the commercial quantity of 250 gms. In all the cases shown in the criminal history applicant has been enlarged on bail. The applicant is in jail since 11.2.2018.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the quantity of recovered contraband, nature of the offence, provisions for release of accused on bail, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Sauniya Prasad Nishad @ Gatti involved in Case Crime No. 109 of 2018, under Section 20/22 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar Banda, District -Banda be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 25.4.2018 Sachdeva
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sauniya Prasad Nishad @ Gatti vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Singh