Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Satyanarayan vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14502 of 2021 Applicant :- Satyanarayan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
Applicant- Satyanarayan seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 198 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S.Saini, District- Kaushambi.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application and the applicant is ready to surrender and apply for regular bail.
In view of the statement made, in case, the applicant appears/surrenders before the court below and applies for regular bail in the aforesaid case, the same be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the above directions, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.9.2021 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satyanarayan vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Virendra Kumar Gupta