Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satya Nand Padney And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18155 of 2019 Petitioner :- Satya Nand Padney And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chetan Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Chetan Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Kritika Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The petitioners in the writ petition are seeking a direction to the respondents to put them in peaceful possession over the plot, Araji No.539, area 0.996 Kari situated in Qasba Kopaganj, Mau.
From the averments of the writ petition it is seen that the plot was purchased by the petitioners from one Mohan Lal Sehgal through registered sale deed dated 31.01.2003. The sale deed was executed for a sum of Rs.1,70,000/- but it is stated that thereafter they have not been given possession and that some unwarranted persons whose names are mentioned in paragraphs 9 & 10 of the writ petition are not allowing them to take possession of the plot.
In our opinion this is a purely private dispute regarding private land purchased by the petitioner and has no concern with the respondents and no direction can be given to the respondents to put the petitioners into possession.
The petitioners may avail such civil remedy as may be available to them in law.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 N Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satya Nand Padney And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Chetan Prakash