Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39382 of 2019 Applicant :- Satish Kumar Saroj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Prakash Saroj,Abhishek Kumar Saroj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar Saroj, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mithlesh Kumar, learned A. G. A. appearing for the State and perused the record.
Applicant has moved the present anticipatory bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No.0352 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420, IPC, and Section 60 of U.P. Excise Act, Police Station Mugra Badshahpur, District Jaunpur.
I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the F.I.R. and also the anticipatory bail rejection order.
The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that it is son of the applicant who was initially arrested; that on the statement of the son of the applicant that the applicant is his father he has been falsely implicated in the present case; that the matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to; that the applicants are willing to participate and cooperate with the investigation. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Sri Mithlesh Kuamr, learned AGA appearing for the State has very strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail with the contention that huge recovery of liquor has been made from the house of the applicant, hence the applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.
Having heard the counsel for the parties, looking to the gravity of the office, no case for grant of any indulgence has been made out.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is hereby rejected.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 VKG