Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Satish Baghel vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18463 of 2013 Applicant :- Satish Baghel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- M.C. Tiwari,Arvind Kumar,Kartikey Singh,Ravindra Nath Rai,Smt. Kiran Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Zafeer Ahmad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the it is a no injury case. It is further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.8.2012. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Satish Baghel involved in Case Crime No.652 of 2012, under Sections 307 I.P.C. and Section 12/15 of the D.A.A., Police Station Sikandra, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 25.4.2018 Dev/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Satish Baghel vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • M C Tiwari Arvind Kumar Kartikey Singh Ravindra Nath Rai Smt Kiran Tiwari