Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sarfraz Alam vs The State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|04 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1773/2014 BETWEEN :
SARFRAZ ALAM, S/O FASEEHUR REHAMAN, AGE:32 YEARS, NO.25, HOSALLIPET, POST:CHIKKAMAGALUR. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ANKALKOTE RAJENDRA SHANTAPPA, ADV., -ABSENT) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI KESHAVA MURTHY, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS SO FAR PETR. IS CONCERNED IN THE ABOVE CASE FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE U/S 3, 4, 5 AND 7 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC PREVENTION ACT REGISTERED BY THE INDIRANAGAR POLICE IN CR. NO.374/2013.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This petition was filed on 20.3.2014. Despite sufficient time being granted, the office objections were not removed. Hence this matter was listed before the Court on 7.6.2014. On which day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. However, the same is not complied. Subsequently, on 16.7.2014 when the matter was listed before the Court, adjournment was granted on payment of cost. It is seen neither the cost is paid nor the objections are attended to. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarfraz Alam vs The State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana