Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10641 of 2018 Petitioner :- Santosh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Other Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Shri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that ends of justice would be served if a mandamus is issued to Respondent no.2/Commissioner, Azamgarh division, Azamgarh to decide Revision No.365/A (Computer No.C2015150000857), (Kedar vs. Santosh and others) under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A,&L.R Act either on the next date or within a stipulated period else, the petitioner shall be put to grave and irreparable loss.
Learned Standing Counsel states that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending and the same be disposed off by giving appropriate direction to the respondent concerned.
This writ petition is disposed off with the direction to Respondent no.2/Commissioner, Azamgarh division, Azamgarh to decide Revision No.365/A (Computer No.C2015150000857), (Kedar vs. Santosh and others) under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A,&L.R Act either on the next date fixed but not later than 4 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private opposite party(s) in the case, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of certified copy of this order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice upon him to submit a compliance report.
The authority concerned shall submit Compliance report in Chambers on 23.10.018 at 4:00 P.M.
Order Date :- 23.3.2018 RS