Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38791 of 2018 Applicant :- Sanju And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Pal Singh Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Daya Shankar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.
I do not find any merit in this application warranting interference by this Court.
At this stage the learned counsel for the applicants made a prayer that the bail application of the applicants in Sessions Trial No. 2423 of 2018 arising out of Complaint Case No. 116 of 2018, under Section 6, POCSO Act, Police Station Kadar Chauwk, District Badaun may be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below.
After hearing learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicants appear and surrender before the Courts below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, then their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably on same day, in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor. For a period of 30 days from today or till applicants surrender and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, interim order shall stand vacated automatically.
Order Date :- 27.10.2018 V.S.Singh