Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17226 of 2021 Applicant :- Sanjeev Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Digitally signed by Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra Date: 2021.10.25 15:36:07 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 932 of 2020, under Sections - 452, 323, 506, 354 I.P.C. and 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station - Loni, District - Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.
Urge has been made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail.
Learned A.G.A. has contended that the accusation levelled against the applicant is specific.
Insofar as the allegations are concerned, the same is very much apparent on record and charge sheet has already been submitted against the applicant after due investigation.
In this case, bare perusal of the first information report itself shows that the allegations are specific against the applicant. In case the applicant has any grievance, he may avail remedy before the appropriate forum. No good ground is made out for anticipatory bail.
Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected.
It is made clear that observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 25.10.2021 S Rawat