Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sandhya And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 37274 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sandhya And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Bahadur Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Sandhya, petitioner-1 appears before the Court. She states that she voluntarily married to Prem Das, petitioner-2. In the FIR also age of Sandhya, petitioner-1 has been mentioned as 18 years, which shows that she is major.
Counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner-1 has voluntarily married to petitioner-2 and they are major, therefore, no offence is made out under Section 366 and 120 B IPC.
In the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance of FIR dated 14.7.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 0598 of 2018, under Section 366 and 120 B IPC, P.S. Kotwali Chhibramau, Distt. Kannauj, till submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr P C.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 Rahul /-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sandhya And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Ram Surat Ram Maurya
Advocates
  • Raj Bahadur Verma