Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Samad@ Aman vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15197 of 2021 Applicant :- Samad@ Aman Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Brijendra Kumar Pandey,Uday Bhan Mishra
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Heard Sri Rakesh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the State. Sri Uday Bhan Mishra and Sri Birendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsels for the first informant are not present even when the matter has been called out in the revised list.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous as the applicant has been arrested, hence the present anticipatory bail application be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Looking to the statement at Bar of learned counsel for the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 25.10.2021 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Samad@ Aman vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 October, 2021
Judges
  • Samit Gopal
Advocates
  • Rakesh Pandey