Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sajid vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5681 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sajid Respondent :- State Of U P And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Belal
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 27.01.2021 registered as Case Crime No.032 of 2021 under Sections 379 I.P.C., P.S.-Didoli, District- Amroha in so far as it relates to the petitioner as also for the direction to the opposite parties not to arrest them in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R.
It is contended that even if the charges relating to the alleged offence are found to be proved, sentence of more than seven years cannot be awarded and in view of this, technically arrest should not be effectuated by the police personnel.
Learned AGA opposed the petition.
Nothing has been indicated in the writ petition which would indicate the stage of the investigation.
We have gone through the allegations contained in the impugned F.I.R., which, prima facie, discloses commission of cognizable offence and as such, we are not inclined to interfere in the F.I.R.
The fact of the matter is that till date arrest has not been effectuated and the petitioner is under an apprehension that he would be arrested in breach of the provisions as contained in Section 41 (1) (b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C. Once the statute prescribes procedure it is always expected of the executing authority that he would adhere to the same.
In case of any violation of the statutory procedure, complaint can also be made to the Magistrate concerned who may remedy the situation.
In view of the above, it is hereby directed that in the event arrest of petitioner is to be effectuated and the offence, in which he is wanted, would not entail sentence of more than 7 years then the concerned police personnel shall deal with the matter strictly in compliance of the provisions as contained in Section 41 (1) (b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.
It is further provided that if the investigation in the matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the benefit of this order would not be extended and the concerned court shall deal with the matter, in accordance with law.
Subject to the above, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.9.2021 JK Yadav/-
Digitally signed by SUNITA AGARWAL Date: 2021.09.21 16:38:10 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by MANJU RANI CHAUHAN Date: 2021.09.21 16:40:32 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sajid vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 September, 2021
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Mohammad Belal