Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sahaspal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1388 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sahaspal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla,Kulveer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Sanotsh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent concerned, not to arrest the petitioners, with a further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 3.12.2018 registered as Case Crime No.621/2018, under Sections 420/406/452/427/504/506/120B IPC, P.S. Nakur, Saharanpur.
This Court has the occasion to peruse the FIR and the FIR in question does discloses a cognizable offence, in view of this, there is no occasion for this Court to quash the FIR, as has been prayed on behalf of petitioners, as such, prayer made on the said score is refused.
Learned counsel for the petitioners next contended that the offences in question as has been alleged to have been committed by the petitioners is under Sections 420/406/452/427/504/506/120B and the said offence even if the charges are found to be proved sentence of more than 7 years can not be awarded and, in view of this, mechanically arrest should not be effectuated by the police personnel.
The fact of the matter is that till date arrest has not been effectuated and this is mere apprehension of the petitioners that they would be arrested in breach of provisions as contained under Section 41 (1) (b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C. Once there is statutory provision provided for then it is always expected that the said provisions would be adhered to and in case there is any violation of the same, complaint can also be made before the Magistrate concerned to remedy the situation.
In view of the above, it is hereby directed that in case arrest of petitioners is to be effectuated and the offence, in which they are wanted, will not entail sentence of more than 7 years then in that event concerned police personnel should deal with the matter in compliance of the provisions as contained under Section 41 (1) (b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.
It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order.
With the above directions, this petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 21.1.2019 Chandra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sahaspal And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 January, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Shukla Kulveer Singh