Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sachin And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19783 of 2020 Applicant :- Sachin And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the charge sheet no. A 214/19 dated 09.12.2019 in S.T. No. 15 of 2020 (State Vs. Sachin and another) out of crime no. 254 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Section 3 (1) (Da) and Section 3 (1) (Dha) S.C./S. T. ACT, Police Station Saraimeer, district Azamgarh pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Azamgarh. Further prayer has been made to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case.
Only prayer pressed by the learned counsel for the applicants is that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer.
From a perusal of the material available on record and keeping in view of the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that offences levelled against the applicants are not made out. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr. P.C. At this stage only a prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of R. P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866; State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426; State of Bihar Vs. P. P. Sharma 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para 10) 2005 SCC (Cr. ) 283. The prayer made in the application is refused.
Hence it is directed that in case the applicants surrender before the court below and applies for bail within 30 days from today the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken/given effect to against the applicants. It is made clear that no further time will be allowed to the applicants for surrender before the court concerned.
With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned court/authority/official shall verify the authenticity of such computerised copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Sachdeva Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.01.05 13:59:14 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sachin And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Pradeep Yadav