Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21833 of 2021 Applicant :- Sachin Alias Rajulley Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Maohammd Nadeem,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dur Vijay Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dur Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the alleged injured in the wife of the applicant and the first informant is the father-in-law of the applicant. It is further contended that the applicant has not assigned the role of firing, inasmuch as the alleged injured who is the wife of applicant/injured has given affidavit in favour of the applicant, the said fact has been mentioned in para 10 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.10.2020. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel on behalf of opposite party opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Sachin Alias Rajulley, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 639 of 2020, under Sections- 307, 325, 504, 120B IPC, Police Station- Kannauj, District- Kannauj, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 Arti Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Kumar Singh Date: 2021.07.30 14:30:11 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad