Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Shaukath Ali [ vs State Rep By Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|08 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, submitted that the presence of the petitioner is required for conducting enquiry. He further submitted that there is no harassment by the respondent police.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
KM
2. The above statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent on 20.06.2017 for enquiry. On such appearance, necessary enquiry be conducted by the respondent on that day and further proceedings shall go on.
3. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Index : Yes/No 08.06.2017 Internet : Yes/No KM To
1. The Inspector of Police, Chengam All Women Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai-606 701.
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.
Crl.O.P.No.8374 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Shaukath Ali [ vs State Rep By Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan