Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Panneerselvam vs Mr S Ponraj

Madras High Court|02 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When this contempt petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor R.MAHADEVAN, J.
KM appearing for the respondent have submitted that the parties entered into a compromise and hence nothing survives in this Contempt Petition for adjudication.
2.Recording the above submission, the contempt petition is closed.
Index : Yes/No 02.06.2017 Internet : Yes/No KM To
1. The Inspector of Police, Pallapatti Police Station, Salem City, Salem.
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.
Cont.P.No.799 of 2017 in Crl.O.P.No.8840 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Panneerselvam vs Mr S Ponraj

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.