Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S Jayanthi vs N Ponnusamy

Madras High Court|09 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

No representation on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent. Even in the last five hearings, namely on 22.12.2016, 04.01.2017, 27.01.2017, 06.02.2017 and on 08.02.2017 there were no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent.
M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
vs Due to continuous absence, the case was directed to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, when the case is listed under the caption "for dismissal", there are no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.02.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To The I Additional District Munsif, Erode.
C.R.P(PD)No.3497 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S Jayanthi vs N Ponnusamy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 February, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran