Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Roohi Irfan And Others vs Mr Mohammed Younus Pasha And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|08 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.263 OF 2018 BETWEEN SMT. ROOHI IRFAN DEAD BY HER LR’s 1. SRI. SYED ADNAAN S/O. IRFAN PASHA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 2. KUM. RIZA FATHIMA D/O. IRFAN PASHA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.C007, 3RD FLOOR, SILVER INFINITY MANOR APARTMENT, M M LAYOUT OPPOSITE AMBEDKAR MEDICAL COLLEGE R T NAGAR, BENGALURU-560032.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KRISHNA B J, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND 1. MR. MOHAMMED YOUNUS PASHA S/O. LATE. MOHAMMED YOUSUFF KHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, M/S. UNIK BUSINESS CENTRE NO.15, ANAND COMPLEX DEVERAJEEVANAHALLI BENGALURU-560045.
2. MR. IRFAN PASHA S/O. LATE. ABDUL RAWOOF AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A D X MAX SPRINT APARTMENT FLOT NO.101, 2ND FLOOR N P FACTORY MAIN ROAD KAVALBYRASANDRA R T NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560032.
3. MR. RIZWAN S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS M/S. IRFAN MEDICALS NO.209, SHOP NO.4 A K COLONY, DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560005.
... RESPONDENTS (R1 - SERVED) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.01.2018 PASSED IN S.C.NO.1938/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDITIONAL S.C.J., COURT OF SMALL CAUSES BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR VACANT POSSESSION.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER On 31-7-2019, this Court passed the following order:
“No representation for the petitioners in the morning as well as in the afternoon.
Time was granted on 27-3-2019, 7-6-2019 and 18-7-2019 for taking steps to serve notice on R2 and R3. But till this day, no steps have been taken.
Finally, a week’s time is granted to take steps. Failing which, list the matter for dismissal on 08-08-2019.”
There is no representation for the petitioners today also. Inspite of granting a week’s time finally, no steps have been taken for service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3. From the order sheet it is seen that petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SMJ Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Roohi Irfan And Others vs Mr Mohammed Younus Pasha And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 August, 2019
Judges
  • S G Pandit Civil